Cases pending (per High Court judge), trends

Rankings Methodology

Large and mid-sized states Andhra Pradesh Bihar Chhattisgarh Gujarat Haryana Jharkhand Karnataka Kerala Madhya Pradesh Maharashtra Odisha Punjab Rajasthan Tamil Nadu Telangana Uttar Pradesh Uttarakhand West Bengal

Small states Arunachal Pradesh Goa Himachal Pradesh Meghalaya Mizoram Sikkim Tripura

Union Territories Andaman & Nicobar Islands Chandigarh Dadra & Nagar Haveli Dadra & Nagar Haveli and Daman & Diu Daman & Diu Delhi Jammu & Kashmir Ladakh Lakshadweep Puducherry

Unranked states Assam Manipur Nagaland

Judiciary

Budgets Per capita spend on judiciary

Human Resources Population per High Court judge Population per sub. court judge High Court judge vacancy Sub. court judge vacancy High Court staff vacancy

Diversity Women judges (High Court) Women judges (sub. court) SC judges, actual to reserved (sub. court) ST judges, actual to reserved (sub. court) OBC judges, actual to reserved (sub. court)

Infrastructure Courthall shortfall

Workload Cases pending (5-10 years) (sub. court) Cases pending (10+ years) (sub. court) Average High Court pendency Average sub. court pendency Case clearance rate (High Court) Case clearance rate (sub. court) Cases pending (5-10 years) (High Court) Cases pending (10+ years) (High Court)

Trends Cases pending (per High Court judge), trends Cases pending (per sub. court judge), trends Total cases pending (High Court), trends Total cases pending (sub. court), trends Judge vacancy (High Court), trends Judge vacancy (sub. court), trends Case clearance rate (High Court), trends Case clearance rate (sub. court), trends Difference in spend: judiciary vs state, trends

State Ranking

State Indicator Data

State Indicator Raw Data

Methodology

This page shows data for all IJR indicators, organized by pillar and theme. The visualisation below shows how the cluster of 18 large and mid-sized states fare on the chosen indicator, across all 3 IJRs. States ranked 1-6 for the indicator are shown in blue, those ranked 7-12 in light green and those ranked 13-18 in light brown. The table shows the indicator value as well as the raw data used to calculate it. Use the sort feature to sort any column in ascending or descending order. Use the filter feature in the first two columns to compare states or see results for only one IJR. To know more about the indicator, click on the ‘i’ button next to the indicator name. Use the side bar and indicator dropdown to navigate to other indicators across pillars and themes.

Share on Twitter

Share on Facebook

Share on WhatsApp

Pillar: Judiciary

Theme: Trends

IJRs: 1, 2, 3

Formula:

Cases pending (High Court judge) – X

2017 | X1

2018 | X2 | ((X2/X1)-1)*100 = a

2019 | X3 | ((X3/X2)-1)*100 = b

2020 | X4 | ((X4/X3)-1)*100 = c

2021 | X5 | ((X5/X4)-1)*100 = d

2022 | X6 | ((X6/X5)-1)*100 = e

5-year average (a,b,c,d,e)

Benchmark: Not available

Scoring guide: Lower, the better

Latest period/date: 2018 to 2022

Latest data source: National Judicial Data Grid; Court News, Supreme Court; Department of Justice

Notes: States and UTs that share a High Court have been assigned the same value. These are Kerala and Lakshadweep; West Bengal and Andaman & Nicobar Islands; Punjab, Haryana and Chandigarh; Assam, Mizoram, Nagaland and Arunachal Pradesh; Maharashtra, Goa, Dadra & Nagar Haveli, Daman & Diu; Tamil Nadu and Puducherry.

IJR 1. HC judge and cases data was not available for 2011-12 for Manipur, Meghalaya and Tripura. Hence, a 4-year trend has been computed for these states. 2. Andhra Pradesh and Telangana are not included as their 5-year data was not available separately.

IJR 2: 1. Andhra Pradesh and Telangana are not included as their 5-year data was not available separately.

IJR 3: Separate data not available for Andhra Pradesh and Telangana for all 5 years considered. Hence, a 3-year trend has been computed for these two states.

Click icons in the column headers to quickly sort and filter rows.